Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

Ä¡°ú±â°ø»çÀÇ Á÷¾÷´É·Â°³¹ßÈÆ·Ã ¸¸Á·µµ ºÐ¼®

An Analysis of Satisfaction with Job Ability Development Training among Dental Technicians

´ëÇÑÄ¡°ú±â°øÇÐȸÁö 2011³â 33±Ç 2È£ p.159 ~ 170
ÀÌÇýÀº, ±èÁ¤¼÷,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
ÀÌÇýÀº ( Lee Hye-eun ) - ½É¹Ìº¸Ã¶±â°øÇÐȸ
±èÁ¤¼÷ ( Kim Jung-Sook ) - ´ëÀüº¸°Ç´ëÇÐ Ä¡±â°ø°ú

Abstract


Purpose: This study were to analyze satisfaction with job ability development training among Dental Technicians¡¯, examine the degree of their actual satisfaction with training courses and their status, and provide some basic data to help improve the quality level, satisfaction, and effective operation of job ability development training in the future.

Methods: This study carried out self-administered questionnaire survey from January 15, 2011 to March 10 by having research subjects as 180 dental technicians who participated in the course of employees¡¯ Job Ability Development Training by ¡¯Gil Occupational Training Institute,¡¯ which is being conducted as part of dental technicians¡¯ job ability development in Seoul region. Among these things, 160(88.8%) copies were collected. Except 19 copies with incomplete response, 141(78.3%) copies were used as the materials of final analysis.

Results: First of all, as a result of grasping the whole satisfaction with training according to general characteristics, the significant difference was indicated in the whole satisfaction with training depending on gender & age, and voluntary participatory intention. Second, the satisfaction with contents of Job Ability Development Training was in order of helpful level in ability development with 4.10(), co-worker¡¯s recommendation and a plan for reparticipation with 4.08(), consistence with the content goal with 4.07(), and reflection of demand with 4.01(). Third, examining satisfaction with instructors of Job Ability Development Training, it is being indicated with a little higher score compared to the satisfaction with other items. Fourth, satisfaction with service of supporting learners in job ability development training was shown to be slightly low in all the items. Especially, the convenience of administrative procedure was indicated to be the lowest with 3.52() Fifth, satisfaction with the facility of job ability development training was showing very low satisfaction compared to other satisfaction items.

Conslusion: A continuous effort will be needed in order to be possibly strengthened dental laboratory technicians¡¯ professionalism and reinforced qualitative level in major ability through offering more educational opportunities and education in good quality.

Å°¿öµå

Satisfaction; Job Ability Development Training

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KCI